|
|
sponsored by Symantec Corporation
|
|
|
Posted:
|
09 May 2012
|
|
Published:
|
09 May 2012
|
|
Format:
|
PDF
|
|
Length:
|
9
Page(s)
|
|
Type:
|
White Paper
|
|
Language:
|
English
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
While many IT professionals believe that using self-signed SSL certificates can help lower security costs, it may not always be true. The total cost of ownership (TCO) of an SSL certificate is far more than the price of the certificate; tacking on additional costs in hardware, software, data center space and more. And it doesn’t end there; a do-it-your-self approach can also put an organization at greater risk.
In this resource, uncover the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a head-to-head comparison of a self-signed architecture and a third-party SSL vendor approach. View now to explore the key considerations before deciding to use self-signed SSL certificates.
|
|
|
|
BROWSE RELATED
RESOURCES
Certificate Authorities | Digital Certificates | Managed Security Services | Public Key Infrastructure | Security Management | SSL | TCO
|
View All Resources
sponsored by Symantec Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs
- from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their
organizations' IT projects - with its network of
|
|
|
Definitions:
|
|
 |
|
All Rights Reserved,
Copyright 2000 - 2013, TechTarget |
|
|
|
|