|
|
sponsored by ComputerWeekly.com
|
|
|
Posted:
|
21 Oct 2011
|
|
Published:
|
23 Sep 2010
|
|
Format:
|
PDF
|
|
Length:
|
3
Page(s)
|
|
Type:
|
White Paper
|
|
Language:
|
English
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
Android has a more sophisticated user interface paradigm than its closest competitor, Apple. Although some of the platform's improvements play catch-up with Apple, in other areas, they outpace Apple, something Google clearly associates with the open-source nature of the product. By endorsing Flash, which Apple will not support, Google is appealing to those who wish to preserve an organisationʼs investments.
While Android has taken market share from all the major smartphone suppliers, the market continues to watch for a platform that can take share from Apple. Many customers ask us to compare the two, and do not ask for comparisons against others (e.g., Research In Motion's BlackBerry), because only Android's target device design, a full open-face touchscreen (keyboard optional), is comparable to Apple's iPhone. While Android has taken market share from RIM, BlackBerry devices generally appeal to those who prefer portrait-oriented keyboard devices.
|
|
|
|
BROWSE RELATED
RESOURCES
Applications Management Software | Applications Software | Mobile Device Management | Mobile Device Management Software
|
View All Resources
sponsored by ComputerWeekly.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs
- from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their
organizations' IT projects - with its network of
|
|
|
Definitions:
|
|
 |
|
All Rights Reserved,
Copyright 2000 - 2013, TechTarget |
|
|
|
|