Debunking the Myth of the Single-Vendor Network

Debunking the Myth of the Single-Vendor Network

Cover

We have collected information from hundreds of client interactions and have performed detailed interviews of nine organizations that have introduced a second vendor into their network environments. Our findings show that most organizations should consider a dual-vendor or multivendor solution as a viable approach to building their network, as significant cost savings are achievable with no increase in network complexity, while improving the focus on meeting business requirements.

Key Findings Include:

  • Introducing a second vendor into the network infrastructure will have no long-term impact on operational costs for organizations following best practices.
  • Introducing a second networking vendor will reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) for most organizations by at least 15% to 25% over a five-year time frame.
  • We did not encounter one example were operational cost savings would offset the equipment cost premium that Cisco generally charges.
  • Most organizations that introduced a second vendor report a lasting decrease in network complexity, compared with an all-Cisco network.
  • Network operations teams that are already using some form of multivendor management tools for fault alerting, configuration management or performance management are well-positioned to take advantage of the second-vendor opportunity.

Read on to learn more about the myths of a Single-Vendor Network and what recommendations are offered towards switching to a dual-vendor or multivendor network.

Vendor:
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Posted:
03 Dec 2010
Published
06 Dec 2010
Format:
PDF
Length:
11 Page(s)
Type:
Analyst Report
Language:
English
Already a Bitpipe member? Login here

Download this Analyst Report!

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy